I wanted to spotlight the Chicago Tribune for covering the growing debate around outdoor cannabis cultivation in Illinois, a topic I first broke details on right here on TheColeMemo.com.

The Tribune highlights how companies like Curaleaf, GTI, and Nature’s Grace are pushing to grow outdoors using hoop houses and screen houses. Former Illinois agriculture regulators granted permission for these kinds of grows, but when new leadership took over, they attempted to revoke that permission and lost in court. The current Curaleaf lawsuit seems to be building on that precedent, seeking the same flexibility. The article also cites my original articles and includes my perspective on why Illinois should rethink its restrictions.
I’ll be sharing the print version of the Chicago Tribune’s coverage below and linking back to my earlier reporting for anyone who wants to dig deeper. I plan to share additional details on this subject in the future.
Original Articles by The Cole Memo
- Exclusive: Outdoor cultivation of cannabis in Illinois – 12/09/2023.
- Exclusive Follow Up: Outdoor cultivation of cannabis in Illinois – 08/19/2024.
- Another Outdoor-Cannabis Lawsuit Hits Illinois – 07/25/2025.
From the Pages of the Chicago Tribune
Note: If the article seems hard to read, you can adjust your view using the Zoom feature.
Below is a text excerpt from the article that features my perspective.
Other industry participants are watching the outcome of the case closely. Cole Preston, author of TheColeMemo.com website and podcast, who first reported on the outdoor grows, sees them not only as a boon for licensed growers, but says it should extend to home growers.
Currently, Illinois law limits home growing to medical cannabis patients, who may grow up to five plants indoors.
“I believe that as long as operators can produce a product that meets Illinois’ strict testing standards, there shouldn’t be an issue with how they grow — be it in an indoor cultivation center, a screen house, a hoop house, a green house, or another type of setup,” he said. Judging from the successful use of outdoor grows so far, he said, “There don’t appear to be any issues.”
Comment below with your thoughts and consider supporting my work!

You can support The Cole Memo with a one-time, monthly, or yearly contribution.
Support The Cole Memo by making a one-time contribution
Support The Cole Memo with monthly contributions
Support The Cole Memo with yearly contributions
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated. Your contribution helps us afford equipment to capture our content and hosting fees to distribute our content.
Your contribution is appreciated. Your contribution helps us afford equipment to capture our content and hosting fees to distribute our content.
Your contribution is appreciated. Your contribution helps us afford equipment to capture our content and hosting fees to distribute our content.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly#247 – What could rescheduling mean for cannabis policy? – The Cole Memo
- #247 – What could rescheduling mean for cannabis policy?
- #246 – Cannabis Is Legal in Illinois, So Why Are People Still Being Arrested
- #245 – Live From the Oval Office: Trump Directs AG to Expedite Cannabis Rescheduling Process
- #244 – Talking Cannabis Rescheduling With Its Harshest Critics
- #243 – Social Equity, Transporters, Rescheduling, and the Future of Hemp With Ali Jubelirer

Leave a comment